Drifting Towards Proportionate Liability: Ethics and Pragmatics

(2015) 74 Cambridge Law Journal 49

21 Pages Posted: 1 Apr 2015

See all articles by Kit Barker

Kit Barker

University of Queensland - TC Beirne School of Law

Date Written: June 30, 2014

Abstract

This article investigates an apparent shift in common law jurisdictions away from the traditional principle of joint and several liability towards proportionate liability in cases involving multiple wrongdoers. This shift is often presented by defendants and legislators as a logical extension of the ethics of comparative (contributory) negligence doctrine. Here we deny any ethical connection between the two doctrines. We also suggest that there is in no good, generalisable ethical or pragmatic argument in favour of proportionate liability in its own right and caution jurisdictions currently considering reform of the joint and several liability rule against leaping to any such assumption.

Keywords: proportionate liability, joint and several liability, contributory negligence, comparative negligence

Suggested Citation

Barker, Kit, Drifting Towards Proportionate Liability: Ethics and Pragmatics (June 30, 2014). (2015) 74 Cambridge Law Journal 49, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2587555

Kit Barker (Contact Author)

University of Queensland - TC Beirne School of Law ( email )

4072 Brisbane, Queensland
Australia

HOME PAGE: http://www.law.uq.edu.au/

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Downloads
69
Abstract Views
440
Rank
598,765
PlumX Metrics