The Two-Sided Speedy Trial Problem

90 Washington Law Review Online 31

12 Pages Posted: 21 Apr 2015 Last revised: 30 Apr 2015

See all articles by Brooks Holland

Brooks Holland

Gonzaga University School of Law

Date Written: April 14, 2015

Abstract

This essay responds to The Not So Speedy Trial Act, by Shon Hopwood, 89 WASH L. REV. 709 (2014). The essay argues that Hopwood's focus on doctrinal reform to limit undue delays in criminal trials overlooks the two-sided speedy trial problem in our criminal justice system. Although the criminal justice system does tolerate unjust delays in some cases, the system also encourages rushed, unconsidered justice in a large number of cases, especially in misdemeanor cases. Accordingly, rather than emphasize doctrinal reform to change the behavior of legal actors at one end of this speedy trial spectrum, we should re-calibrate resources in our criminal justice system to provide both speedy and deliberate trials across the full run of cases.

Suggested Citation

Holland, Brooks, The Two-Sided Speedy Trial Problem (April 14, 2015). 90 Washington Law Review Online 31, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2596361

Brooks Holland (Contact Author)

Gonzaga University School of Law ( email )

721 N. Cincinnati Street
Spokane, WA 99220-3528

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Downloads
363
Abstract Views
1,164
Rank
152,077
PlumX Metrics