Chevron's Generality Principles

24 Pages Posted: 9 Jan 2016

See all articles by Emily Hammond

Emily Hammond

George Washington University - Law School

Date Written: May 29, 2015

Abstract

Chevron is surely one of the most influential doctrines of administrative law. Both in judicial opinions and the scholarly literature, its original insights and subsequent evolution have contributed much to our understanding of the roles of the “four” branches, especially as those roles relate to judicial review. But what does Chevron have to say about the many agency behaviors that are relatively insulated from review? The vast majority of agency policymaking decisions never reach court; for example, they might not be “final” or even “action,” or they may pose standing or ripeness difficulties for would-be petitioners. This Essay argues that Chevron’s impact might reach even these rarely reviewed types of agency behavior. Descriptively, this claim is supported by an analysis of judicial opinions applying Chevron principles to assess agency actions that are not interpretations of organic statutes. Normatively, this claim challenges administrative law to turn its focus to agencies’ unreviewable discretionary space, where a Chevron lens offers important insights about the extent to which agencies can construct their own legitimacy.

Suggested Citation

Hammond, Emily, Chevron's Generality Principles (May 29, 2015). Fordham Law Review, Vol. 83, No. 655, 2014, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2612262

Emily Hammond (Contact Author)

George Washington University - Law School ( email )

2000 H Street, N.W.
Washington, DC 20052
United States

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Downloads
43
Abstract Views
293
PlumX Metrics