Rethinking Constitutional Change

16 Pages Posted: 12 Jun 2015

Date Written: February 1, 1994

Abstract

This article examines the so-called “New Deal Constitutional Revolution” and comments in particular on the work of Barry Cushman who maintains that neither the election of 1936 nor Franklin Roosevelt’s “Court packing” plan caused a “switch in time” in 1937. Severely challenging “externalist” explanations, Cushman maintains that the individual justices remained doctrinally consistent. This article argues that, in spite of the importance of “internalist” considerations and arguable consistencies in the jurisprudence of the Justices, several factors suggest the limits of Cushman’s thesis and point to the likelihood that “external” factors also played an important role in the Court’s decisions in 1937. Most important, it points to reasons to believe that Justice Roberts, the critical “swing” Justice in those decisions, did in fact shift his views in voting to uphold pivotal New Deal measures, and it stresses the critical importance of doctrinal areas where Justices enjoy relatively open areas for the exercise of discretion.

Keywords: New Deal “Constitutional Revolution,” Owen Roberts, Barry Cushman, “Court packing,” “switch in time”

Suggested Citation

Purcell, Edward A., Rethinking Constitutional Change (February 1, 1994). Virginia Law Review, Vol. 80, No. 277, 1994, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2616268 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2616268

Edward A. Purcell (Contact Author)

New York Law School ( email )

185 West Broadway
New York, NY 10013
United States

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Downloads
37
Abstract Views
551
PlumX Metrics