Presuming Damages for Unemployment Distress

18 Pages Posted: 19 Jun 2015 Last revised: 24 Jul 2015

Date Written: June 17, 2015

Abstract

When someone becomes involuntarily unemployed, they typically lose not only income and wealth but also psychological well-being as a result of the experience of being unemployed. This paper proposes that when a plaintiff proves that a defendant's illegal action caused the plaintiff to be unemployed, courts can and should rebuttably presume a damages award amount for “unemployment distress.” That presumed amount would be the product of the total time the plaintiff spent unemployed and the average unit cost of unemployment distress in the population of prevailing plaintiffs. The paper shows how this unemployment distress presumption operates and identifies its relative advantages: simplicity, anchoring, and a better fit with constitutional law as compared to other laws that constrain jury discretion to award noneconomic damages.

Keywords: unemployment, distress, presumption

JEL Classification: K13, K31, K41

Suggested Citation

Pandya, Sachin S., Presuming Damages for Unemployment Distress (June 17, 2015). Employee Rights and Employment Policy Journal, Vol. 19, No. 1, 2015: 85-102, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2619850

Sachin S. Pandya (Contact Author)

University of Connecticut ( email )

University of Connecticut School of Law
65 Elizabeth Street
Hartford, CT 06105
United States
8605705169 (Phone)

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Downloads
33
Abstract Views
427
PlumX Metrics