The Evolution of Constitutional Adjudication in the Chinese Special Administrative Regions: Theory and Evidence

The American Journal of Comparative Law, Vol. 61, 2013

The Chinese University of Hong Kong Faculty of Law Research Paper No. 2013-13

31 Pages Posted: 19 Oct 2016

See all articles by Eric C. Ip

Eric C. Ip

The University of Hong Kong

Date Written: 2013

Abstract

Under what conditions will two sub-national supreme courts diverge fundamentally in their understandings of, and approaches toward, constitutional adjudication, in spite of being invested with identical jurisdictions and overseen by a shared sovereign, within roughly the same time frame? China’s two autonomous Special Administrative Regions (SARs), Hong Kong and Macau, possess constitutional frameworks that are nearly the same, yet their paths of judicial review of legislation could not be more different. While the Chinese SARs commonly feature undivided governments returned by rigged electoral systems dominated by the pro-establishment blocs in their respective polities, the Hong Kong Court of Final Appeal has repeatedly nullified unconstitutional acts of the legislature with finality, while the Macau Tribunal de U´ltima Instaˆncia has never challenged the validity of legislation at all. This study argues that such divergence can hardly be blamed on the differences between Hong Kong’s English common law and Macau’s Portuguese civil law heritages. It reveals, with the aid of a theoretical framework that integrates the concept of transaction costs into the strategic model of judicial review, that factional infighting inside, and formidable popular resistance against, Hong Kong’s ruling elite have disabled the government to credibly threaten the Court while reinforcing demand for judicial review of unpopular statutes. By contrast, high levels of executive-legislative harmony, minimal popular unrest, and weak pressures to democratize have rendered it very difficult for the Macau Tribunal to defy its government with impunity. Overall, this study contributes to several increasingly important academic fields, including comparative Chinese law, sub-national constitutional law, and judicial review in authoritarian polities.

Suggested Citation

Ip, Eric C., The Evolution of Constitutional Adjudication in the Chinese Special Administrative Regions: Theory and Evidence (2013). The American Journal of Comparative Law, Vol. 61, 2013, The Chinese University of Hong Kong Faculty of Law Research Paper No. 2013-13, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2653076

Eric C. Ip (Contact Author)

The University of Hong Kong ( email )

Pokfulam Road
Hong Kong, Hong Kong
China

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Downloads
77
Abstract Views
426
Rank
563,673
PlumX Metrics