Freedom of Competition and the Rhetoric of Federalism: North Carolina Board of Dental Examiners v. FTC

31 Pages Posted: 10 Sep 2015

Date Written: September 9, 2015

Abstract

In the North Carolina Board of Dental Examiners case, the FTC sued a state agency charged with regulating the dental profession after the agency used its licensing powers to bar non-dentists from offering teeth-whitening services, not to protect the general public, but to prevent competition against licensed dentists. The Board claimed immunity under the Parker antitrust immunity doctrine, but the Supreme Court rejected that defense. This article reviews the decision and explains why Parker immunity should be applied much more rarely than it currently is. It concludes with specific suggestions for narrowing this anomalous immunity doctrine.

Keywords: North Carolina Board of Dental Examiners v. FTC, Parker immunity, antitrust, state action, active supervision, clear articulation

Suggested Citation

Sandefur, Timothy, Freedom of Competition and the Rhetoric of Federalism: North Carolina Board of Dental Examiners v. FTC (September 9, 2015). 2014-2015 Cato Supreme Court Review pp. 195-225, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2658427

Timothy Sandefur (Contact Author)

Goldwater Institute ( email )

500 E. Coronado Rd.
Phoenix, AZ 85004
United States
(602) 462-5000 (Phone)
(602) 256-7045 (Fax)

HOME PAGE: http://www.goldwaterinstitute.org

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Downloads
29
Abstract Views
485
PlumX Metrics