Phasing Out of Suspended Sentences - Background Paper

Tasmanian Sentencing Advisory Council, August 2015

94 Pages Posted: 29 Sep 2015

See all articles by Lorana Bartels

Lorana Bartels

Australian National University (ANU) - ANU Centre for Social Research and Methods

Rebecca Bradfield

University of Tasmania

Date Written: August 1, 2015

Abstract

This paper aims to provide a comprehensive background in relation to the use of suspended sentences in Tasmania. It is intended as a companion report to the Phasing out of Suspended Sentences: Consultation Paper that sets out possible replacements for the suspended sentence in Tasmania.

This paper aims to provide a comprehensive background in relation to the use of suspended sentences in Tasmania. It addresses the following aspects of the Terms of Reference:

1. Examine Tasmania’s current use of suspended sentences of imprisonment for adults and young offenders including: (a) the frequency with which they are used; (b) the offences for which they are used; (c) the length of sentences; (d) breach rates; (e) sentencing practices on breach; and (f) recidivism rates including where reoffending does not result in a breach;

2. Examine Tasmania’s current use of other sentencing options including actual terms of imprisonment, community based orders and conditional release orders and the possible effect on them of the abolition of suspended sentences;

3. Research legislative approaches to suspended sentencing options in other jurisdictions in Australia and overseas, including an analysis of (and commentary on any published statistics on) suspended sentences and breaches and of the effect of the abolition of suspended sentences on imprisonment numbers.

This paper is intended as a companion report to the consultation paper on possible replacements for the suspended sentence in Tasmania.

Chapter 2 provides an overview of the current legal framework and examines the use of suspended sentences in Tasmania. It provides a comparison with the law in other Australian jurisdictions, as well as the position in Canada and in England and Wales.

Chapter 3 contains the Council’s analysis of Tasmania’s current use of all sentencing options available under the Sentencing Act 1997 (Tas) in the Supreme Court. This includes actual imprisonment, fully and partly suspended sentences, community based orders and conditional release orders. It also sets out data from the Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS) in relation to the use of different sentencing options in other jurisdictions to provide a comparison with sentencing practice in Tasmania.

Chapter 4 contains the Council’s analysis of Tasmania’s current use of all sentencing options available under the Sentencing Act 1997 (Tas) in the Magistrates Court. It also sets out data from the ABS in relation to the use of different sentencing options in lower courts in other jurisdictions to provide a comparison with sentencing practice in Tasmania.

Chapter 5 provides an analysis of the breach of suspended sentences in Tasmania, sentencing practices on breach and recidivism rates including where reoffending does not result in a breach. It also discusses research that has examined breaches of suspended sentences and recidivism rates in other jurisdictions.

The companion paper, Phasing Out of Suspended Sentences - Consultation Paper, can be found at http://ssrn.com/abstract=2666393

Keywords: suspended sentences, law, Tasmania, Australia, comparative law, sentencing options, background paper

Suggested Citation

Bartels, Lorana and Bradfield, Rebecca, Phasing Out of Suspended Sentences - Background Paper (August 1, 2015). Tasmanian Sentencing Advisory Council, August 2015, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2666391

Lorana Bartels (Contact Author)

Australian National University (ANU) - ANU Centre for Social Research and Methods ( email )

Beryl Rawson Building (13)
Canberra, ACT 0200
Australia

Rebecca Bradfield

University of Tasmania ( email )

French Street
Sandy Bay
Tasmania, 7250
Australia

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Downloads
53
Abstract Views
465
Rank
687,173
PlumX Metrics