Some Biases and Evolutionary Homomorphisms Implicit in the Calculation of Returns

21 Pages Posted: 13 Jun 2010 Last revised: 3 Nov 2015

Date Written: 2015

Abstract

Investment returns are a core element of decisions in various “end-uses”. Investment returns are often calculated in different ways and over different horizons, and regardless of the method of computation, they often contain substantial Biases which distort results in the “end-uses”. These biases tend to have adverse multiplier effects because investment returns are the foundation or core elements in various statistical analysis such as: i) developing distributions of expected returns, ii) time series analysis; iii) developing options pricing models; iv) estimating various types of risk; v) developing pricing models for insurance; vi) for the evaluation of, and capital-budgeting for large billion-dollar projects. The two most popular methods for calculating long terms returns are simple-returns and compounded returns (sometimes expressed as natural-logs) which yield vastly different results that have significant computational consequences. Thus, more awareness of the effects of compounding is necessary. This article contributes to the existing literature by: i) explaining the biases and effects inherent in the calculation of compounded returns (distinct from human biases that can affect returns, and vice versa) – which in turn, implies that various investment approaches (such as “minimum variance investing”; “geometric mean maximization”; etc.) are wrong and inaccurate; ii) some of the Biases introduced herein are new types of Evolutionary Homomorphisms; iii) showing how biases in returns and the calculation methods can affect the analysis of Pattern Formation, Chaos and Adaptive Systems – the discussions in Preis, Kenett, et. al. (2012); Kenett, Preis, et. al. (2012); Preis (2011); Podobnik, Horvatic, Petersen & Stanley (2009); Fenn, et al. (2011); Kriener, Helias, Rotter, et. al. (2014); Hsieh (1993); Menna, Rotundo & Tirozzi (2002); and Hommes (2002) omitted such effects; and iv) explaining some of the effects of market volatility on compounded returns.

.

Keywords: portfolio management, risk management, compounding, returns, Indices, complexity

Suggested Citation

Nwogugu, Michael C. I., Some Biases and Evolutionary Homomorphisms Implicit in the Calculation of Returns (2015). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1623927 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1623927

Michael C. I. Nwogugu (Contact Author)

Independent ( email )

P. O. Box 11104
Enugu 400007, Enugu State 400007
Nigeria
2348149062100 (Phone)

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Downloads
30
Abstract Views
857
PlumX Metrics