Open Access to Broadband Networks: A Case Study of the Aol/Time Warner Merger
46 Pages Posted: 7 May 2001
Abstract
This Article provides a framework for the analysis of the potential effects of the recent AOL/Time Warner merger on the markets forbroadband Internet access and broadband Internet content. We consider two anticompetitive strategies that a vertically integrated firm such as AOL Time Warner, offering both broadband transport and portal services, could in theory profitably pursue. First, an integrated provider could engage in conduit discrimination?insulating its own conduit from competition by limiting its distribution of affiliated content and services over rival platforms. Second, an integrated provider could engage in content discrimination?insulating its own affiliated content from competition by blocking or degrading the quality of outside content. After examining the competitive conditions in the broadband portal and transport markets, we evaluate the post-merger incentives of AOL Time Warner to engage in either or both forms of discrimination.
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?
Recommended Papers
-
The Broadband Debate: A User's Guide
By Tim Wu
-
The New Network Neutrality: Criteria for Internet Freedom
By Sascha Meinrath and Victor Pickard
-
Economists' Statement on Network Neutrality Policy
By William J. Baumol, Robert E. Litan, ...
-
The Never-Was-Neutral Net and Why Informed End Users Can End the Net Neutrality Debates
-
Local Broadband Access: Primum Non Nocere or Primum Processi? A Property Rights Approach
By Bruce M. Owen and Gregory L. Rosston
-
Regulatory Status of VoIP in the Post-Brand X World
By Jerry Ellig and Alastair Walling
-
By Christopher Marsden and Jonathan Cave
-
Pricing Strategies and Welfare Effects of Competition between Two Next-Generation Platforms