Pertussis Vaccine: An Analysis of Benefits, Risks, and Costs

New England Journal of Medicine, Vol. 301, No. 17, pp. 906-911, 1979

6 Pages Posted: 8 Feb 2016

See all articles by Jeffrey Koplan

Jeffrey Koplan

Independent

Stephen C. Schoenbaum

Josiah Macy Jr. Foundation

Milton Weinstein

Harvard University

David Fraser

Independent

Abstract

Using decision analysis, we estimated the benefits, risks and costs of routine childhood immunization against pertussis. Without an immunization program, we predict that there would be a 71-fold increase in cases and an almost fourfold increase in deaths (2.0 to 7.6) per cohort of one million children. With a vaccination program, we predict 0.1 case of encephalitis associated with pertussis and five cases of post-vaccination encephalitis; without a program there would be only 2.3 cases of encephalitis associated with pertussis. Community vaccination would reduce by 61 percent the costs related to pertussis. Our analysis supports continuation of vaccination in routine childhood immunization programs, but suggests the need for more reliable data on complications from the vaccine, further study of the epidemiology of pertussis and development of a less toxic vaccine.

Keywords: Pertussis immunization, cost-effectiveness analysis

JEL Classification: D61,D78

Suggested Citation

Koplan, Jeffrey and Schoenbaum, Stephen C. and Weinstein, Milton and Fraser, David, Pertussis Vaccine: An Analysis of Benefits, Risks, and Costs. New England Journal of Medicine, Vol. 301, No. 17, pp. 906-911, 1979, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2720637

Jeffrey Koplan

Independent

Stephen C. Schoenbaum (Contact Author)

Josiah Macy Jr. Foundation ( email )

44 E. 64th St.
New York, NY 10065
United States

Milton Weinstein

Harvard University ( email )

1875 Cambridge Street
Cambridge, MA 02138
United States

David Fraser

Independent

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Downloads
34
Abstract Views
487
PlumX Metrics