Federal Sentencing During the Interregnum: Defense Practice as the Blakely Dust Settles

9 Pages Posted: 14 May 2016

See all articles by Ian Weinstein

Ian Weinstein

Fordham University School of Law

Nathaniel Marmur

Stillman & Friedman, P.C.

Date Written: 2004

Abstract

Although the long term impact of Blakely v. Washington is not yet clear, no one can doubt that the case raises a host of immediate, significant and perplexing practical questions for federal criminal defense attorneys. The Supreme Court has granted certiorari in a pair of cases raising Blakely issues and oral argument is scheduled for October 4, 2004. It seems likely that the Supreme Court will offer some guidance by Thanksgiving. Until the Court rules, uncertainty will continue as the lower courts interpret Blakely in disparate ways. Once the Court does rule, many hard questions may remain unanswered. This article suggests how defense counsel can effectively represent clients during this period of uncertainty.

Suggested Citation

Weinstein, Ian and Marmur, Nathaniel, Federal Sentencing During the Interregnum: Defense Practice as the Blakely Dust Settles (2004). Federal Sentencing Reporter, Vol. 17, No. 1, 2004, Fordham Law Legal Studies Research Paper No. 2779313, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2779313

Ian Weinstein (Contact Author)

Fordham University School of Law ( email )

140 West 62nd Street
New York, NY 10023
United States

Nathaniel Marmur

Stillman & Friedman, P.C. ( email )

425 Park Avenue
New York, NY 10022
United States

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Downloads
37
Abstract Views
746
PlumX Metrics