Combining Double Sampling and Bounds to Address Non-Ignorable Missing Outcomes in Randomized Experiments
24 Pages Posted: 5 Aug 2013 Last revised: 27 Jun 2016
Date Written: June 26, 2016
Abstract
Missing outcome data plague many randomized experiments. Common solutions rely on ignorability assumptions that may not be credible in all applications. We propose a method for confronting missing outcome data that makes fairly weak assumptions but can still yield informative bounds on the average treatment effect. Our approach is based on a combination of the double sampling design and non-parametric worst-case bounds. We derive a worst-case bounds estimator under double sampling and provide analytic expressions for variance estimators and confidence intervals. We also propose a method for covariate adjustment using post-stratification and a sensitivity analysis for non-ignorable missingness. Finally, we illustrate the utility of our approach using Monte Carlo simulations and a placebo-controlled randomized field experiment on the effects of persuasion on social attitudes with survey-based outcome measures.
Keywords: causal inference, experiments, missing data, bounds, ignorability
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?
Recommended Papers
-
Identification and Estimation of Local Average Treatment Effects
By Joshua D. Angrist and Guido W. Imbens
-
Estimating the Return to Schooling: Progress on Some Persistent Econometric Problems
By David Card
-
By James J. Heckman, Lance Lochner, ...
-
Life Cycle Schooling and Dynamic Selection Bias: Models and Evidence for Five Cohorts
-
By James J. Heckman and Edward Vytlacil
-
Earnings, Schooling, and Ability Revisited
By David Card