Autonomy and Agency in American Criminal Process

22 Pages Posted: 7 Oct 2016

Date Written: October 6, 2016

Abstract

This is an essay about the interaction of two assumptions that shape the way fairness is pursued in American criminal procedure. The first assumption is that fairness is best advanced through a series of procedural rights that defendants can invoke or waive at their discretion. The second assumption is that the choices made by defense attorneys can fairly be attributed to their clients. The first of these assumptions reflects a strong national commitment to individualism; the second reflects a heavy reliance on lawyers to safeguard defendants’ interests. Both reflect a deeply rooted distrust of government. Each of these two assumptions is defensible, and each relates to fundamental aspects of the national political culture. Taken together, though, they have narrowed what fairness means in American criminal adjudication; they combine with a kind of negative synergy, making each harder to defend than it might be without the other.

Keywords: Criminal Procedure, Adjudication, Waiver

Suggested Citation

Sklansky, David, Autonomy and Agency in American Criminal Process (October 6, 2016). Stanford Public Law Working Paper No. 2849226, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2849226 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2849226

David Sklansky (Contact Author)

Stanford University ( email )

Stanford, CA 94305
United States

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Downloads
164
Abstract Views
1,155
Rank
327,606
PlumX Metrics