Permanent Name Suppression for a Child Convicted of Homicide

5 Pages Posted: 19 May 2020 Last revised: 9 Aug 2021

See all articles by Nessa Lynch

Nessa Lynch

Victoria University of Wellington, Te Herenga Waka - Faculty of Law

Date Written: 2016

Abstract

This article discusses the Court of Appeal decision which overturned a High Court decision refusing permanent name suppression for a 13-year-old child convicted of manslaughter (R v DP & RP [2015] NZHC 1765). It examines the wider question of a principled approach to such cases of child-perpetrated homicide. In New Zealand, such cases are tried and sentenced in the adult jurisdiction. The author suggests that extreme youth raises questions of appropriate criminal procedure and jurisdiction in this area, such as the concept of permanent name suppression. The article concludes that there is a strong case for permanent name suppression for young offenders who are tried and sentenced in the adult jurisdiction, due to their particular characteristic of youth, and the importance of reintegration.

Keywords: Criminal Law, Homicide, Name Suppression, Criminal Procedure, New Zealand

JEL Classification: K00, K10, K14, K40

Suggested Citation

Lynch, Nessa, Permanent Name Suppression for a Child Convicted of Homicide (2016). New Zealand Law Journal, 13, 2016 , Victoria University of Wellington Legal Research Paper No. 21/2021, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2869485

Nessa Lynch (Contact Author)

Victoria University of Wellington, Te Herenga Waka - Faculty of Law ( email )

PO Box 600
Wellington, 6140
New Zealand

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Downloads
75
Abstract Views
358
Rank
576,502
PlumX Metrics