Leaving Behind the Commonwealth Model of Rights Review: Ireland as an Example of Collaborative Constitutionalism

31 Pages Posted: 15 Feb 2017

See all articles by Eoin Carolan

Eoin Carolan

University College Dublin (UCD) - School of Law

Date Written: September 1, 2016

Abstract

This paper develops a model of collaborative constitutionalism as an alternative to conventional models of constitutional review. It argues that the Irish system of rights-based review differs in important ways from the new Commonwealth model of constitutionalism advanced by Stephen Gardbaum. While the Irish courts possess 'strong form' powers of judicial review, the paper provides a detailed examination of the interpretative and substantive principles of Irish law that function, in practice, as structural barriers to judicial supremacy.

The paper moves on to argue that these factors are not unique to the Irish situation. Similar principles can be found in other constitutional systems. The paper argues therefore that, between the American model of so-called ‘strong form’ of judicial review and the new Commonwealth model of parliamentary-judicial dialogue, the Irish experience reflects a possible third way, which ‘eschew the exaggerated images of institutional conflict that the language of judicial or parliamentary supremacy tends to evoke’.

Suggested Citation

Carolan, Eoin, Leaving Behind the Commonwealth Model of Rights Review: Ireland as an Example of Collaborative Constitutionalism (September 1, 2016). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2916378 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2916378

Eoin Carolan (Contact Author)

University College Dublin (UCD) - School of Law ( email )

Belfield
Dublin 4
Ireland

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Downloads
175
Abstract Views
959
Rank
309,447
PlumX Metrics