Enhancing the Procedural Legitimacy of the U.N. Security Council: A Normative and Empirical Assessment

(2005) 17 Sri Lanka Journal of International Law 1-53

54 Pages Posted: 4 Apr 2017

See all articles by Sébastien Jodoin

Sébastien Jodoin

McGill University - Faculty of Law

Date Written: March 28, 2005

Abstract

In this essay, the author examines the question of the legitimacy of the Security Council. The author defines legitimacy as the justification of authority and focuses on legitimacy of Council procedure. He scrutinizes three influential normative theories of international legitimation present in the discourse of the on-going Council reform debate: realism, international legal legitimacy and supranational democratic legitimacy. Using these theories as a starting point, he develops his own theory of empirical legitimacy composed of a series of elements, which if implemented would increase the perception of the Council's legitimacy. He also proposes various ways through which these elements could be realized. Finally, the author concludes by arguing that the question of the Council's legitimacy is crucial in light of its importance for the legitimacy of international law on the whole. As such, he proposes a framework to revitalize the mired Security Council reform process.

Suggested Citation

Jodoin, Sébastien, Enhancing the Procedural Legitimacy of the U.N. Security Council: A Normative and Empirical Assessment (March 28, 2005). (2005) 17 Sri Lanka Journal of International Law 1-53, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2942160 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2942160

Sébastien Jodoin (Contact Author)

McGill University - Faculty of Law ( email )

3644 Peel Street
Montreal H3A 1W9, Quebec H3A 1W9
Canada

HOME PAGE: http://www.mcgill.ca/law/about/profs/jodoin-sebastien

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Downloads
57
Abstract Views
460
Rank
659,560
PlumX Metrics