Download This PaperAustralian Best Practices - A Comparison with the United Kingdom and the United States
Chapter 10 in: Australian Clinical Legal Education, ANU Press (February 2017)
Washington University in St. Louis Legal Studies Research Paper
Monash University Faculty of Law Legal Studies Research Paper No. 2017/06
24 Pages Posted: 1 Apr 2017 Last revised: 18 Sep 2017
Date Written: February 1, 2017
Abstract
This chapter, from the book "Australian Clinical Legal Education" compares efforts in Australia, the United Kingdom, and the United States to establish best practices or standards in clinical legal education and the resulting best practices that were developed. The material in this chapter may aid faculty teaching clinical courses in other countries as they consider whether to develop their own best practices in light of their cultures, legal institutions, and systems of legal education.
Keywords: legal education, clinical legal education, best practices, standards, designing clinical courses, operating clinical programs
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Anna Cody
University of New South Wales (UNSW) - Faculty of Law ( email )
Kensington, New South Wales 2052
Australia
Jeff Giddings
Monash University - Faculty of Law ( email )
Wellington Road
Clayton, Victoria 3800
Australia
HOME PAGE: http://https://research.monash.edu/en/persons/jeffrey-m-giddings
Griffith Law School ( email )
Nathan Campus, GU
Nathan, 4111
Australia
HOME PAGE: http://https://www.griffith.edu.au/criminology-law/griffith-law-school/staff/jeff-giddings
Mary Anne Noone
La Trobe Law School ( email )
Martin Building Room 249
Bundoora, VIC 3083
Australia
(03)9479 2195 (Phone)
(03)9479 1607 (Fax)
Simon Rice
Professor of Law, The University of Sydney Law School, University of Sydney, NSW, Australia – Australian Discrimination Law Experts Group ( email )
New Law Building, F10
The University of Sydney
Sydney, NSW 2006
Australia