Differential Patent Terms and the Commercial Capacity of Innovation

18 Tex. Intell. Prop. L.J. 373

30 Pages Posted: 8 May 2017

See all articles by Amir H. Khoury

Amir H. Khoury

Tel Aviv University - Buchmann Faculty of Law

Date Written: May 5, 2009

Abstract

During the past four decades much has been written, both in legal and economic literature, about the elements that should determine the scope of patent protection. While one segment of that research advances the view that patent rights (the patent breadth), in and of themselves are sufficient for attaining the optimal degree of socially-desirable patent protection, the other segment contends that the patent term (length) needs to be factored in. My research taps into this debate and emphasizes the need to discontinue the use of a single patent term for all types of patents. Specifically, I propose using a differential patent term, in which duration is contingent on the type of innovation and its underlying technology. Here, I resort to, among other things, the Strasbourg Agreement Concerning the International Patent Classification, a system of classification that can contribute towards applying the patent length factor in an efficient and relatively cheap manner.

Keywords: patent term, scope of patent protection, length of patent protection, duration is contingent on the type of innovation, patent classification, Strasbourg Agreement Concerning the International Patent Classification, intellectual property protection, patent breadth

Suggested Citation

Khoury, Amir H., Differential Patent Terms and the Commercial Capacity of Innovation (May 5, 2009). 18 Tex. Intell. Prop. L.J. 373, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2964388

Amir H. Khoury (Contact Author)

Tel Aviv University - Buchmann Faculty of Law ( email )

Ramat Aviv
Tel Aviv, 69978
Israel
(972)-36405263 (Phone)
(972)-3640 5349 (Fax)

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Downloads
133
Abstract Views
575
Rank
388,166
PlumX Metrics