'The Big Chill'? A Comparative Analysis of Effects-Based Tests for Misuse of Market Power

44 Pages Posted: 31 May 2017

See all articles by Katharine Kemp

Katharine Kemp

University of New South Wales (UNSW) - UNSW Law & Justice

Date Written: May 30, 2017

Abstract

In November 2016, the Australian government made the controversial announcement that it plans to amend the prohibition of misuse of market power in section 46(1) of the Competition and Consumer Act 2010 (Cth) (‘CCA’) to incorporate an effects-based test, the ‘substantial lessening of competition’ test, in line with the recommendations of the Competition Policy Review Panel. This proposal has met with vigorous opposition, particularly by those who argue that the amendment would in fact deter firms with substantial market power from engaging in conduct which is procompetitive and in the interests of consumers: that is, it would ‘chill’ competition. This article provides vital context for this debate by explaining the origins of these arguments and making a comparative analysis of the proposed amendment to section 46(1) of the CCA against several effects-based tests for unilateral anti-competitive conduct proposed or adopted in other jurisdictions. It concludes that, while claims regarding the ‘chilling’ effects of the proposed amendment have been overstated, there are more subtle weaknesses in the proposal which may create disincentive effects for dominant firms.

Keywords: misuse of market power, monopolisation, antitrust, competition law, unilateral conduct, effects test, effects-based test, exclusion, monopolization

Suggested Citation

Kemp, Katharine, 'The Big Chill'? A Comparative Analysis of Effects-Based Tests for Misuse of Market Power (May 30, 2017). University of New South Wales Law Journal, Vol. 40, No. 2, 2017, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2977116

Katharine Kemp (Contact Author)

University of New South Wales (UNSW) - UNSW Law & Justice ( email )

Kensington, New South Wales 2052
Australia

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Downloads
536
Abstract Views
2,060
Rank
95,516
PlumX Metrics