The Irrationality Defense of Paternalism

7 Pages Posted: 28 Jun 2017

Date Written: June 27, 2017

Abstract

In this paper, we investigate the challenges associated with the competing approaches of utility theory and behavioural economics. It has been become commonplace to argue that humans act irrationally. This fallacious argument provides the foundation for paternalism. The fallacy of course is the error in determining objective value and absolute measures of rationality. Everyone is subjective in their utility valuations and consumer behaviour varies over time and place even for individuals. There is no challenge to regulatory design. The problem is not the addition of regulations designed to objectively maximise selected outcomes but rather the introduction of subjective decisions imposed from above paternalistically.

Keywords: Utility Theory, Paternalism, Rational Choice, Economics, Psychology

Suggested Citation

Wright, Craig S, The Irrationality Defense of Paternalism (June 27, 2017). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2993306 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2993306

Craig S Wright (Contact Author)

nChain ( email )

London
United Kingdom

RCJBR Holdings PLC ( email )

5 Brayford Square
London, E1 0SG
United Kingdom

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Downloads
260
Abstract Views
1,689
Rank
215,631
PlumX Metrics