Ownership and Sustainable Development Conundrum: The World Bank's Use of Borrowers' Systems

29 Pages Posted: 11 Jul 2017

See all articles by Stéphanie de Moerloose

Stéphanie de Moerloose

Universidad Austral; Humboldt University Berlin

Date Written: June 1, 2017

Abstract

In 2015, though several joint statements, Multilateral Development Banks (MDBs) repeatedly stated their support to the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). But 2016 saw another milestone in development finance: the World Bank adopted new environmental and social safeguards that place more responsibility on Borrowing Countries, which will enter into force in 2018. Shifting responsibilities had already been attempted in the wake of the 2005 “Paris Declaration on Aid Effectiveness”, when the World Bank launched a pilot program in order to use Borrowers’ systems to address environmental and social safeguard issues. But the policy’s objectives of both supporting Borrowers’ own policies without watering down environmental and social performances resulted in practice in a rather complex and intrusive process. The paper seeks to analyze whether the new safeguards will be a solution to this dilemma, both supporting the implementation of sustainable development while placing more responsibility on Borrowers, or if the World Bank is likely to abandon at least one side of the issue, either by conserving an intrusive process for Borrowers or by foregoing the implementation of sustainable development as envisioned by the SDGs.

Keywords: ownership, sovereignty, sustainable development, World Bank, safeguards, use of country systems

Suggested Citation

de Moerloose, Stéphanie, Ownership and Sustainable Development Conundrum: The World Bank's Use of Borrowers' Systems (June 1, 2017). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2997521 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2997521

Stéphanie De Moerloose (Contact Author)

Universidad Austral ( email )

Cerrito 1250
Buenos Aires, 1010
Argentina

Humboldt University Berlin ( email )

Berlin
Germany

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Downloads
58
Abstract Views
466
Rank
653,722
PlumX Metrics