The Killing of Cecil the Lion as an Impetus for Policy Change

Stefan Carpenter and David M. Konisky, The Killing of Cecil the Lion as an Impetus for Policy Change," Oryx, Forthcoming

30 Pages Posted: 13 Sep 2017

See all articles by David Konisky

David Konisky

Indiana University Bloomington - School of Public & Environmental Affairs (SPEA)

Stefan Carpenter

Indiana University Bloomington - School of Public & Environmental Affairs (SPEA)

Date Written: July 19, 2017

Abstract

The killing of Cecil the Lion in July 2015 generated considerable worldwide media attention. In this study, we measure public interest in Cecil’s death to examine the degree to which this high-profile incident represented the type of focusing event that public policy scholars often emphasize as being important for triggering policy change. Finding that public interest in lion conservation spiked in the weeks immediately following the incident, we then analyse whether this focusing event led to policy changes to restrict trophy hunting in eight countries – the United States, Spain, France, Russia, Canada, South Africa, Germany, and Mexico – that most frequently import lion trophies. Our analysis finds that the surge in public attention seems to have had only a limited impact on the adoption of significant new policy, although it may have hastened changes in some countries.

Suggested Citation

Konisky, David and Carpenter, Stefan, The Killing of Cecil the Lion as an Impetus for Policy Change (July 19, 2017). Stefan Carpenter and David M. Konisky, The Killing of Cecil the Lion as an Impetus for Policy Change," Oryx, Forthcoming, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3035345

David Konisky (Contact Author)

Indiana University Bloomington - School of Public & Environmental Affairs (SPEA) ( email )

1315 East Tenth Street
Bloomington, IN 47405
United States

Stefan Carpenter

Indiana University Bloomington - School of Public & Environmental Affairs (SPEA) ( email )

1315 East Tenth Street
Bloomington, IN 47405
United States

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Downloads
105
Abstract Views
712
Rank
463,225
PlumX Metrics