Production Shock Distribution and Risk Aversion in Multi-Agent-Tournaments

38 Pages Posted: 8 Nov 2017

See all articles by Bjoern Hartig

Bjoern Hartig

Royal Holloway, University of London

Matthias Reitzner

Universität Osnabrück

Date Written: November 6, 2017

Abstract

We analyze how agents’ effort choice in multi-agent rank-order tournaments depend on the probability distribution of the random production shock and on the agents’ risk-aversion. If the shock is non-uniform, equilibrium effort depends on the number of winners and losers in the tournament. It is maximized when the share of winners corresponds to the relative location of the maximum density in the shock’s distribution. The effort choice of risk averse agents also depends on the number of winners and losers. It is possible that effort increases as agents become more risk-averse and that risk-averse agents exert more effort than risk-neutral agents when the tournament has more winners than losers. Unless agents are risk-neutral and liability is unlimited, the principal faces a complex trade-off between induced effort and total bonus payments. Her payoff may be higher with risk-averse agents than with risk-neutral agents if the number of winners is high.

Keywords: Incentives, Risk Aversion, Tournament, Contest, Order-Statistics, Principal-Agent Theory, Contracts

JEL Classification: D21, D23, J41, L14

Suggested Citation

Hartig, Bjoern and Reitzner, Matthias, Production Shock Distribution and Risk Aversion in Multi-Agent-Tournaments (November 6, 2017). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3066454 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3066454

Bjoern Hartig (Contact Author)

Royal Holloway, University of London ( email )

Royal Holloway College
Egham
Surrey, Surrey TW20 0EX
United Kingdom
+447565576512 (Phone)

HOME PAGE: http://www.royalholloway.ac.uk

Matthias Reitzner

Universität Osnabrück ( email )

Neuer Graben
Osnabrück, 49074
Germany

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Downloads
64
Abstract Views
1,309
Rank
627,771
PlumX Metrics