Proportionality in Self-Defence – Proportionate to What?

Pandoras Box, Vol. 24, pp. 65-78, 2017

Sydney Law School Research Paper No. 17/92

15 Pages Posted: 10 Nov 2017

See all articles by Alison Pert

Alison Pert

The University of Sydney - Faculty of Law

Date Written: November 8, 2017

Abstract

It is a well-settled rule of customary international law that any use of armed force by a state, to be justified as lawful self-defence under either art 51 or customary law, must satisfy various conditions including the essential criteria of necessity and proportionality. This article focuses on the criterion of proportionality, and examines some of the questions concerning its meaning and application - many of which find no definitive answer in ICJ jurisprudence and the literature. It considers questions such as whether actions in response to a past attack, or to forestall a future attack, can be legally characterised as self-defence; the fundamental purpose of self-defence; and ultimately, to what must the action be proportionate.

Keywords: International Law, Customary International Law, Use of Force, Self-Defence, Proportionality

JEL Classification: K10, K30, K33

Suggested Citation

Pert, Alison, Proportionality in Self-Defence – Proportionate to What? (November 8, 2017). Pandoras Box, Vol. 24, pp. 65-78, 2017, Sydney Law School Research Paper No. 17/92, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3067750

Alison Pert (Contact Author)

The University of Sydney - Faculty of Law ( email )

New Law Building, F10
The University of Sydney
Sydney, NSW 2006
Australia

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Downloads
457
Abstract Views
1,550
Rank
117,407
PlumX Metrics