Retreat Alternatives in NEPA: A Tool for the Perplexed

32 Pages Posted: 24 Jan 2018 Last revised: 11 Apr 2018

See all articles by Jamison E. Colburn

Jamison E. Colburn

The Pennsylvania State University (University Park) – Penn State Law

Date Written: January 21, 2018

Abstract

This symposium essay explores the leverage that our National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) can provide to those aiming to change the direction we have been heading in our wildfire epidemic. The epidemic has resulted from decades of policy choices at the local, state and federal levels. Changing directions across that broad and deep a field of policies is necessarily a long-term agenda. But the essay explores some "retreat" alternatives where these fire policies are concerned as they have arisen in our national wildfire policy and planning spheres. Ultimately, the aims are modest because there is no quick fix on wildfire. But careful planning and careful uses of NEPA, with special attention to NEPA doctrines in the Ninth, Tenth, and D.C. Circuits, can empower those convinced that changes are needed. Advocates with this kind of countervailing power can help reshape our wildfire policies in a variety of agency contexts.

Suggested Citation

Colburn, Jamison E., Retreat Alternatives in NEPA: A Tool for the Perplexed (January 21, 2018). Journal of Environmental Law & Litigation, Vol. 33, No. 2, Penn State Law Research Paper No. 1-2018, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3106234

Jamison E. Colburn (Contact Author)

The Pennsylvania State University (University Park) – Penn State Law ( email )

Lewis Katz Building
University Park, PA 16802
United States

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Downloads
34
Abstract Views
329
PlumX Metrics