Business Incubators and Accelerators: A Co-Citation Analysis-Based, Systematic Literature Review

26 Pages Posted: 17 Feb 2017 Last revised: 31 Jan 2018

See all articles by J. Hausberg

J. Hausberg

School of Business Administration and Economics, University of Osnabrueck

Sabrina Korreck

University of Hamburg

Date Written: February 3, 2017

Abstract

A long and rich research tradition exists on the phenomenon of business incubators since this kind of venture support institution first emerged. One can observe an increasing heterogeneity of incubation beyond the traditional mainstream focus on regional development and university-based incubators. In the last decade, in particular the phenomenon of accelerators as a particular form of incubators received increasing research interest. A few literature reviews started summarizing the field, but left some important issues unanswered. This systematic review study contributes to this effort deriving current themes and a research agenda. We find that open innovation and social capital theory increasingly complement the resource-based view as frameworks to understand business incubation. Moreover, the phenomenon of private corporate incubators and accelerators gains traction, both in entrepreneurship theory and practice.

Keywords: Business Incubators, Accelerators, Technology Incubators, New Technology Based Firms

JEL Classification: M13, O18, O25

Suggested Citation

Hausberg, Johann Piet and Korreck, Sabrina, Business Incubators and Accelerators: A Co-Citation Analysis-Based, Systematic Literature Review (February 3, 2017). Journal of Technology Transfer, Forthcoming, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2919340 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2919340

Johann Piet Hausberg (Contact Author)

School of Business Administration and Economics, University of Osnabrueck ( email )

Rolandstr. 8
Osnabrück, 49074
Germany

HOME PAGE: http://www.wiwi.uni-osnabrueck.de/tim

Sabrina Korreck

University of Hamburg ( email )

Allende-Platz 1
Hamburg, 20146
Germany

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Downloads
669
Abstract Views
3,873
Rank
72,837
PlumX Metrics