Do Proxies for Informed Trading Measure Informed Trading? Evidence from Illegal Insider Trades

65 Pages Posted: 9 Feb 2018 Last revised: 21 Apr 2018

See all articles by Kenneth R. Ahern

Kenneth R. Ahern

University of Southern California - Marshall School of Business; National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER)

Multiple version iconThere are 2 versions of this paper

Date Written: January 23, 2018

Abstract

This paper exploits hand-collected data on illegal insider trades to provide new evidence of the ability of standard measures of illiquidity to detect informed trading. Controlling for unobserved cross-sectional and time-series variation, sampling bias, and strategic timing of insider trades, I find that when information is short-lived, absolute order imbalance and the autocorrelation of order flows are statistically and economically robust predictors of insider trading. However, when information is long-lasting, insiders strategically time their trades to avoid illiquidity and none of the measures I consider are reliable predictors of insider trading, including bid-ask spreads, Kyle's $\lambda$, and Amihud illiquidity.

Keywords: Insider Trading, Asymmetric Information, Liquidity, Price Impact, Information Networks

JEL Classification: D53, D83, D85, G12, G14, K42

Suggested Citation

Ahern, Kenneth Robinson, Do Proxies for Informed Trading Measure Informed Trading? Evidence from Illegal Insider Trades (January 23, 2018). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3113869 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3113869

Kenneth Robinson Ahern (Contact Author)

University of Southern California - Marshall School of Business ( email )

701 Exposition Blvd
Los Angeles, CA California 90089
United States

HOME PAGE: http://www-bcf.usc.edu/~kahern/

National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER) ( email )

1050 Massachusetts Avenue
Cambridge, MA 02138
United States

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Downloads
516
Abstract Views
2,810
Rank
90,157
PlumX Metrics