Possible Constitutional Objections to the Powers to Ban ‘Terrorist’ Organisations
42 Pages Posted: 8 Aug 2018
Date Written: 2004
Abstract
The first part of this article considers - from a constitutional perspective - the Criminal Code proscription regime, while the second part is devoted to examining the constitutional validity of the Charter of UN proscription regime. With both regimes, three constitutional restrictions come to the fore: the implied freedom of political communication, the implied freedom of association, and the separation of judicial power. The last raises the specific question whether these regimes give rise to bills of attainder.
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Tham, Joo-Cheong, Possible Constitutional Objections to the Powers to Ban ‘Terrorist’ Organisations (2004). University of New South Wales Law Journal, Vol. 27, No. 2, 2004, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3217002
Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?
Feedback
Feedback to SSRN
If you need immediate assistance, call 877-SSRNHelp (877 777 6435) in the United States, or +1 212 448 2500 outside of the United States, 8:30AM to 6:00PM U.S. Eastern, Monday - Friday.