Access by Design, Benefits if Convenient: A Closer Look at the Pandemic Influenza Preparedness Framework's Standard Material Transfer Agreements

The Milbank Quarterly 2018 The Milbank Memorial Fund

Griffith University Law School Research Paper No. 18-30

30 Pages Posted: 22 Nov 2018 Last revised: 4 May 2020

See all articles by Michelle Rourke

Michelle Rourke

Griffith University, Griffith Law School

Abstract

Context: The World Health Organization (WHO) adopted the Pandemic Influenza Preparedness Framework (PIP Framework) after being forced to grapple with the demands of developing countries for the fairer distribution of vaccines and antivirals created using influenza viruses isolated from within their territories. Though adopted as a non-binding resolution, the PIP Framework has been praised for its novel legal approach to access and benefit-sharing (ABS), using Standard Material Transfer Agreements (SMTAs) to create binding terms and conditions on both providers and users of PIP biological materials. The PIP Framework’s SMTA1 regulates the movement of influenza viruses with human pandemic potential through the WHO’s Global Influenza Surveillance and Response System (GISRS) as it operates to monitor the spread of seasonal influenza and detect the emergence of pandemic strains. Member States give consent to the WHO to transfer their materials to third-parties under the terms of a negotiated SMTA2. The SMTA2 details benefits such as vaccines and antivirals to be made available to the WHO for distribution in the event of an influenza pandemic. Method: Analysis of the PIP Framework, its SMTAs and secondary sources to determine whether the PIP Framework will effectively function as an ABS instrument during an influenza pandemic. Findings: In the lead up to, and during a pandemic, the SMTA1 secures access to influenza viruses for the WHO, and the SMTA2 secures access for commercial users of virus samples, but the SMTA2 may be ineffective in securing tangible benefits for the sovereign providers of those materials. Conclusion: As the international community starts to consider how to best regulate access to non-pandemic influenza pathogen samples, it is imperative that we first address the shortcomings of the only pathogen-specific international ABS instrument, and we should do so before it is put to the ultimate test.

Keywords: access and benefit-sharing, PIP Framework, pandemic influenza, World Health Organization, genetic resources

Suggested Citation

Rourke, Michelle, Access by Design, Benefits if Convenient: A Closer Look at the Pandemic Influenza Preparedness Framework's Standard Material Transfer Agreements. The Milbank Quarterly 2018 The Milbank Memorial Fund, Griffith University Law School Research Paper No. 18-30, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3289027

Michelle Rourke (Contact Author)

Griffith University, Griffith Law School ( email )

Nathan Campus, GU
Nathan 4111
Australia

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Downloads
46
Abstract Views
403
PlumX Metrics