Does Poaching Distort Training?
38 Pages Posted: 7 Mar 2003
There are 2 versions of this paper
Does Poaching Distort Training?
Date Written: June 2002
Abstract
We analyse the efficiency of the labour market outcome in a competitive search equilibrium model with endogenous turnover and endogenous general human capital formation. We show that search frictions do not distort training decisions if firms and their employees are able to coordinate efficiently, for instance, by using long-term contracts. In the absence of efficient coordination devices there is too much turnover and too little investments in general training. Nonetheless, the number of training firms and the amount of training provided are constrained optimal, and training subsidies therefore reduce welfare.
Keywords: Matching, Training, Poaching, Efficiency
JEL Classification: J24, J41, J63, J64
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?
Recommended Papers
-
Incentives in Competitive Search Equilibrium
By Espen R. Moen and Asa Rosen
-
The Cyclical Behavior of Equilibrium Unemployment and Vacancies Revisited
By Marcus Hagedorn and Iourii Manovskii
-
The Cyclical Behavior of Equilibrium Unemployment and Vacancies: Evidence and Theory
-
Incentives in Competitive Search Equilibrium and Wage Rigidity
By Espen R. Moen and Asa Rosen
-
Incentives in Competitive Search Equilibrium and Wage Rigidity
By Espen R. Moen and Asa Rosen
-
Search-Theoretic Models of the Labor Market: A Survey
By Richard Rogerson and Randall Wright
-
Search-Theoretic Models of the Labor Market-A Survey
By Richard Rogerson, Robert Shimer, ...
-
Unemployment Fluctuations with Staggered Nash Wage Bargaining
By Mark Gertler and Antonella Trigari
-
Employer-to-Employer Flows in the U.S. Labor Market: The Complete Picture of Gross Worker Flows