Monopolisation, Market Liberalisation and Madness: Comparative Approaches to Water Supply Governance

Danielle Ireland-Piper and Leon Wolff (eds), Global Governance and Regulation: Order and Disorder in the 21st Century (Routledge 2018)

29 Pages Posted: 10 Apr 2019

Date Written: March 30, 2018

Abstract

This chapter considers governance issues in the context of a ubiquitous and necessary resource: water. In many countries, water was traditionally supplied to the public through monopolistic, often government-run, entities. Over the past quarter century, governments around the world have moved from government-owned and operated monopolistic water supply structures to corporatised or, in some cases, privatised regimes for the supply of water to households and businesses. Some jurisdictions have even introduced competition in water supply. The variety of ways that jurisdictions have tackled these issues, and the extent to which these reforms have themselves been subject to change, illustrate the increasing level of disorder that currently characterises the global water sector. What had been a staid, stable sector is now in a state of flux across jurisdictions. Such changes have raised questions as to the best ways to balance efficient management of water assets, particularly given the prevalence of natural monopoly characteristics in the industry; the desire for profitability; conservation and safety concerns; and the critical issue of affordability of this necessary good. Accordingly, this chapter first examines structural characteristics of the water supply industry. It next reviews how the Australian water supply regime has evolved over the past 20 years. It then examines how jurisdictions in the United Kingdom have approached the supply of water and considers the extent to which options tried there may offer lessons for Australia. The chapter concludes that models trialed in other countries may indeed offer useful solutions as the Australian water industry continues to evolve. At the same time, the chapter concludes that global disorder in this area, as a result of attempts to tailor solutions to local conditions, might be a positive outcome.

Keywords: water supply governance, monopolisation, commercialisation, corporatisation, GBE

JEL Classification: K23, K22, K32, H42

Suggested Citation

Baumfield, Victoria Schnure, Monopolisation, Market Liberalisation and Madness: Comparative Approaches to Water Supply Governance (March 30, 2018). Danielle Ireland-Piper and Leon Wolff (eds), Global Governance and Regulation: Order and Disorder in the 21st Century (Routledge 2018), Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3353047

Victoria Schnure Baumfield (Contact Author)

Bond University - School of Law ( email )

Gold Coast, QLD 4229
Australia

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Downloads
43
Abstract Views
254
PlumX Metrics