Dynamic Regulatory Distortions: Coal Procurement at U.S. Power Plants

99 Pages Posted: 21 Feb 2019 Last revised: 26 Jun 2023

See all articles by Akshaya Jha

Akshaya Jha

Carnegie Mellon University; National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER)

Date Written: June 26, 2023

Abstract

Economists hypothesize that regulators provide utilities with a rate of return on capital far higher than the market cost of capital, distorting the level and timing of capital investments. I test this hypothesis by studying a frequently-adjusted form of working capital: coal stockpiles at U.S. power plants. I estimate a dynamic plant-level model of coal purchase and storage, finding that price-regulated plants incur far lower per-unit storage costs than similar market-based plants. This implicit regulatory subsidy on coal storage distorts plants’ coal procurement behavior, resulting in annual aggregate productive efficiency costs of 1.3 billion dollars (14% of coal purchase costs). The majority of this efficiency cost stems from dynamic distortions to the timing of coal purchases rather than static distortions to coal storage levels.

Keywords: Gold-Plating, Capital Bias, Output Price Regulation, Rate-of-Return Regulation, Cost-of-Service Regulation, Utilities, Industry Restructuring, Working Capital, Coal Storage, Power Plants, Electricity

JEL Classification: K23, L51, L94, Q48

Suggested Citation

Jha, Akshaya, Dynamic Regulatory Distortions: Coal Procurement at U.S. Power Plants (June 26, 2023). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3330740 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3330740

Akshaya Jha (Contact Author)

Carnegie Mellon University ( email )

Pittsburgh, PA 15213-3890
United States

National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER) ( email )

1050 Massachusetts Avenue
Cambridge, MA 02138
United States

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Downloads
235
Abstract Views
1,675
Rank
239,213
PlumX Metrics