Anti-Formalism and the Preordained Birth of Chinese Jurisprudence

25 Pages Posted: 10 May 2019

See all articles by Samuli Seppänen

Samuli Seppänen

The Chinese University of Hong Kong (CUHK) - Faculty of Law

Date Written: April 12, 2018

Abstract

This article describes attempts in Chinese legal scholarship to produce indigenised forms of jurisprudence. These attempts are partly animated by an ethos of anti-formalism and the assumption that Chinese legal thought and the Chinese approach to adjudication are more flexible and more responsive to social concerns than (Western) legal formalism. Interestingly, prominent currents of European and American jurisprudence have made use of similar anti-formalist arguments since the beginning of the twentieth century. The anti-formalist impulse and the calls to indigenise Chinese jurisprudence are therefore best understood as performative strategies that support specific ideological projects, such as the effort to legitimise China’s political status quo.

Keywords: Chinese law, legal theory

Suggested Citation

Seppänen, Samuli, Anti-Formalism and the Preordained Birth of Chinese Jurisprudence (April 12, 2018). China Perspectives (2018/14), 31-38, The Chinese University of Hong Kong Faculty of Law Research Paper No. 2019-08, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3370726 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3370726

Samuli Seppänen (Contact Author)

The Chinese University of Hong Kong (CUHK) - Faculty of Law ( email )

6/F, Lee Shau Kee Building
Shatin, New Territories
Kowloon, Sha Tin
Hong Kong

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Downloads
75
Abstract Views
503
Rank
576,502
PlumX Metrics