Dissonant Constitutionalism and Lady Hale
29(2) King's Law Journal 177-186, 2018
11 Pages Posted: 11 May 2019
Date Written: November 7, 2018
Abstract
Stories of constitutional struggle almost always revolve around power and self-interest; the legislature looking to make its mark, or the executive overstepping certain bounds. It is the commonplace story of the separation of powers, each entity desiring more clout and none of them willing to concede any. These tired examples are external and overt, and align well with our thoughts on constitutional politics in contemporary democracies. Rarely do such accounts involve internal—personal—struggle. Additionally, constitutional struggles are almost always borne out in formal settings: the judiciary issuing a judgement, or a ministerial department issuing a new regulation. Rarely do such struggles involve more informal settings. The latter, in both these examples, is the struggle of Lady Hale, now President of the United Kingdom Supreme Court. This piece argues that Lady Hale, much like many constitutional actors in the UK (lawyers, judges, scholars, etc.), is experiencing cognitive dissonance about the current state of the UK constitution, and especially its underlying principles. However evidence of her dissonance has not played out in formal settings, such as judgements, but in extra-judicial speeches.
Keywords: Lady Hale, UK Supreme Court, dissonant constitutionalism, public speeches, UK constitution, rule of law, parliamentary sovereignty
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation