Worker Reciprocity and Employer Investment in Training
Tinbergen Institute Discussion Paper No. 2002-090/3
19 Pages Posted: 27 Jan 2003
Date Written: September 2002
Abstract
Standard economic theory predicts that firms will not invest in general training and will underinvest in specific training. Empirical evidence indicates, however, that firms do invest in general training of their workers and also points to no underinvestment in specific training. We propose a simple model in which a firm invests the socially optimal amounts in general and specific training if the worker is sufficiently motivated by reciprocity. A reciprocal worker may be willing to give the firm the full return on its investment. We present empirical evidence that is strongly supportive for the proposed mechanism. Workers with a high sensitivity to reciprocity have 15 percent higher training rates than workers with a low sensitivity to reciprocity.
Keywords: Training, Reciprocity
JEL Classification: J41
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?
Recommended Papers
-
Private Sector Training and its Impact on the Earnings of Young Workers
-
Minimum Wages and Training Revisited
By David Neumark and William Wascher
-
Is the German Apprenticeship System a Panacea for the Us Labour Market?
By Dietmar Harhoff and Thomas J. Kane
-
Beyond the Incidence of Training: Evidence from a National Employers Survey
By Lisa M. Lynch and Sandra E. Black