Using Choice Framing to Improve the Design of Agricultural Subsidy Schemes

39 Pages Posted: 7 Aug 2019 Last revised: 6 Dec 2019

See all articles by Neel Ocean

Neel Ocean

University of Warwick

Peter Howley

University of Leeds - Faculty of Business

Date Written: December 5, 2019

Abstract

Existing agri-environment subsidy schemes have suffered from poor uptake. The prospect of the UK’s exit from the EU means that agricultural financial subsidies will likely need to be redesigned. This paper leverages insights from prospect theory to test three different aspects of policy framing, which we hypothesised will affect the decisions made by farmers in a policy context. Using a randomised quasi-experimental survey on UK farmers, we find evidence that mental accounting and loss aversion affects policy-related decision-making. Our findings have implications for the design of future policy, and specifically highlight the importance of (i) whether payments are integrated or segregated, and the need for a reduction in application burden; (ii) the labelling applied to agricultural funding schemes; (iii) and the importance of reference points in devising new scheme alternatives.

Keywords: prospect theory, framing, mental accounting, loss aversion, agricultural subsidy

Suggested Citation

Ocean, Neel and Howley, Peter, Using Choice Framing to Improve the Design of Agricultural Subsidy Schemes (December 5, 2019). Leeds University Business School Working Paper, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3432955 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3432955

Neel Ocean (Contact Author)

University of Warwick

Gibbet Hill Rd.
Coventry, West Midlands CV4 8UW
United Kingdom

Peter Howley

University of Leeds - Faculty of Business ( email )

Leeds LS2 9JT
United Kingdom

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Downloads
158
Abstract Views
1,298
Rank
338,002
PlumX Metrics