Dignity and Cessio Bonorum in Early-Modern Dutch Learned Legal Literature

28 Pages Posted: 20 Sep 2016 Last revised: 15 Feb 2020

See all articles by Wouter Druwé

Wouter Druwé

Research Foundation - Flanders (FWO)

Date Written: September 14, 2016

Abstract

Imprisonment for debt was a common sanction in the early modern period. Through the learned legal institute of the cessio bonorum, or its customary legal alternatives, insolvent debtors could avoid the shame of prison. Nevertheless, in order to discourage irresponsible administration of one's patrimony, local customs and princely ordinances often added shaming sanctions to the ius commune institute. This contribution first presents the legal framework of the cessio bonorum, as well as some shaming practices, especially in the Low Countries. In its main part, this article analyses early modern Netherlandish learned legal literature on the cessio bonorum and outlines ten different arguments related to honour and dignity. Authors discussed which goods the ceding debtors were allowed to retain both at the moment of the cession and thereafter. On the one hand, fraudulent debtors did not deserve any humane treatment and, thus, neither the benefice of cession. For other classes of debtors on the other hand, like clerics, noblemen or members of the military, the obligations going along with the cession of goods were less severe. The arguments outlined in this paper also illustrate the entanglement of humanitarian and instrumental reasoning.

Keywords: Cessio bonorum, Insolvency, Dignity, Low Countries, Ius Commune

Suggested Citation

Druwé, Wouter, Dignity and Cessio Bonorum in Early-Modern Dutch Learned Legal Literature (September 14, 2016). Max Planck Institute for European Legal History Research Paper Series No. 2016-08, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2838877

Wouter Druwé (Contact Author)

Research Foundation - Flanders (FWO) ( email )

Sint-Michielsstraat
6
Leuven, 3000
Belgium

HOME PAGE: http://www.law.kuleuven.be/romrecht/engels/people/00092170

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Downloads
173
Abstract Views
938
Rank
312,838
PlumX Metrics