Download This PaperDoes Tort Deter? Inconclusive Empirical Evidence about the Effect of Liability in Preventing Harmful Behaviour
Van Rooij, B., & Brownlee, M. Does Tort Deter? Inconclusive empirical evidence about the effect of liability in preventing harmful behavior. In B. Van Rooij & D. D. Sokol (Eds.), Cambridge Handbook on Compliance. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press (2021 Forthcoming)
UC Irvine School of Law Research Paper No. 2020-26
Amsterdam Law School Research Paper No. 2020-22
General Subserie Research Paper No. 2020-04
23 Pages Posted: 10 Apr 2020 Last revised: 28 May 2020
Date Written: March 29, 2020
Abstract
This chapter assesses whether tort liability can have a deterrent effect and reduce risky and harmful behaviour. It discusses insights from key reviews of empirical work across regulatory domains. These reviews show that this body of empirical work, in all but one of the domains (corporate director liability towards shareholders) studied, does not find conclusive evidence that tort deters or that it does not deter. Studies do find some indication of negative side effects of tort regimes, such as lowering necessary services, enhancing unnecessary legal defensive practices and raising costs. The chapter concludes that common assumptions about the role tort can play in compliance require a more solid empirical basis. The chapter presents directions for future tort and deterrence research with a focus on better understanding the causal processes through which liability rules may shape human and organizational conduct.
Keywords: tort, deterrence, empirical legal studies, medical malpractice, accidents, liability
JEL Classification: K10, K13, K20, K32, K42
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation