Firm Life Cycle, Expectation Errors and Future Stock Returns

78 Pages Posted: 27 Feb 2019 Last revised: 27 Jul 2022

See all articles by Theodosia Konstantinidi

Theodosia Konstantinidi

City University London - The Business School

Date Written: June 1, 2022

Abstract

I study the return predictability of firm life cycle, originally documented by Dickinson (2011). I show that a hedge portfolio strategy going long on mature firms and short on introduction firms generates a significant hedge portfolio return of 1.29% per month in return-weighted portfolios and 0.72% in value-weighted portfolios. The returns to firm life cycle are related to investors’ and analysts’ expectation errors, are driven by market-wide investor sentiment, and are more pronounced among stocks with low institutional ownership and high idiosyncratic volatility. Quantile regressions show that introduction firms have considerably greater uncertainty and skewness in future earnings growth outcomes than mature firms, such that analysts are better able to justify optimistically biased forecasts for introduction firms compared to mature firms.

Keywords: Firm life cycle, Stock returns, Expectation errors, Limits to arbitrage

JEL Classification: G12, G14

Suggested Citation

Konstantinidi, Theodosia, Firm Life Cycle, Expectation Errors and Future Stock Returns (June 1, 2022). Journal of Banking and Finance, Forthcoming, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3332513 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3332513

Theodosia Konstantinidi (Contact Author)

City University London - The Business School ( email )

106 Bunhill Row
London, EC1Y 8TZ
United Kingdom

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Downloads
371
Abstract Views
1,437
Rank
148,413
PlumX Metrics