Truth-Telling Dominating Strategy: Impossibilities of Shill-Proofness

35 Pages Posted: 21 Apr 2020 Last revised: 25 Jul 2022

See all articles by Seungwon (Eugene) Jeong

Seungwon (Eugene) Jeong

College of Business, Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology (KAIST)

Date Written: February 12, 2020

Abstract

A strategy is truth-telling dominating (TTD) if it weakly (strictly, resp.) dominates truth-telling for all (some, resp.) strategy profiles of others. A strategy is iteratively TTD (i-TTD) if any iterate is TTD and payoff improving. We show that any mechanism only with undominated equilibria is not i-TTD manipulable. We also show that any TTD shill-bidding strategy is i-TTD. The Vickrey-Clarke-Groves (VCG) mechanism is not shill-proof, but neither the existence nor the nonexistence of TTD strategy had previously been known. We show both that VCG is TTD manipulable when externalities exist, but not TTD manipulable in package auctions without externalities.

Keywords: obvious strategy-proofness, manipulability, VCG, shill bidding, package auction, externalities, referral, referrer's dilemma

JEL Classification: C78, D44, D62, D82

Suggested Citation

Jeong, Seungwon (Eugene), Truth-Telling Dominating Strategy: Impossibilities of Shill-Proofness (February 12, 2020). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3573629 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3573629

Seungwon (Eugene) Jeong (Contact Author)

College of Business, Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology (KAIST)

Daejeon, 34141
Korea, Republic of (South Korea)

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Downloads
80
Abstract Views
657
Rank
555,637
PlumX Metrics