Free-Flow of Data. Is International Trade Law the Appropriate Answer?

F. Fabbrini, E. Celeste, J. Quinn (eds.), Data Protection Beyond Borders. Transatlantic Perspectives on Extraterritoriality and Sovereignty, Hart Pub. 2020 (Forthcoming)

18 Pages Posted: 6 May 2020 Last revised: 2 Oct 2020

See all articles by Vincenzo Zeno-Zencovich

Vincenzo Zeno-Zencovich

University of Rome III - Department of Law

Date Written: October 2, 2020

Abstract

The paper - presented in a Conference organized in March 2020 at Dublin City University on "Data Protection Imperialism and Data Sovereignty" - points out that free-flow of data is a growing issue of contention in international relations and that there is an urgent need for agreements on the issue. It doubts however that traditional international trade law instruments (typically GATT and GATS, and related regional agreements) are the appropriate tools, while surely international trade fora have the experience to come up with ad hoc solutions based on national sovereignty, reciprocity and involvement of other international organizations such as ITU. The paper also posits that from a FFD perspective there is little difference – nor a significant difference can be made – between “personal data” and “non-personal data”.

Keywords: data, data protection, international trade, WTO, MFN, NTP, ITU, OECD, G20

Suggested Citation

Zeno-Zencovich, Vincenzo, Free-Flow of Data. Is International Trade Law the Appropriate Answer? (October 2, 2020). F. Fabbrini, E. Celeste, J. Quinn (eds.), Data Protection Beyond Borders. Transatlantic Perspectives on Extraterritoriality and Sovereignty, Hart Pub. 2020 (Forthcoming), Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3562986 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3562986

Vincenzo Zeno-Zencovich (Contact Author)

University of Rome III - Department of Law ( email )

Via Ostiense, 159
Rome, 00154
Italy

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Downloads
145
Abstract Views
677
Rank
365,750
PlumX Metrics