Artificial Intelligence and Global Trade Governance: A Pluralist Agenda

44 Pages Posted: 21 Sep 2020

See all articles by Han-Wei Liu

Han-Wei Liu

Singapore Management University - Yong Pung How School of Law; Monash University

Ching-Fu Lin

National Tsing Hua University

Date Written: May 1, 2019

Abstract

This Article is the first of its kind to map out imminent challenges facing the World Trade Organization (WTO) against the emergence of artificial intelligence. It does so by examining critically AI’s normative implications for four issue areas—robot lawyers, automated driving systems, computer-generated works, and automated decision-making processes. By unpacking the diverse governance approaches taken in addressing these issues, this Article highlights the underlying economic, societal, cultural, and political interests in different jurisdictions and identifies the growing normative relevance of global legal pluralism. In light of the changing fabric of international law, this Article seeks to reconceptualize AI and global trade governance by offering three recommendations and two caveats. First, more institutional flexibility within the WTO is essential to allow for rigorous and dynamic cross-sectoral dialogue and cooperation. Less focus should be laid on the specificity and predictability of rules, but on their adaptability and optimal design. Second, while we acknowledge that the human rights-based approach to AI governance offers a promising baseline for many, it is crucial to point out that the global trading system should be more deferential to local values and cultural contexts in addressing AI-related issues. One must exercise greater caution and refrain from pushing strong harmonization initiatives. The third recommendation highlights incrementalism, minilateralism, and experimentalism. We propose that the global trading system should accommodate and encourage emerging governance initiatives of AI and trade governance. Two crucial caveats, however, should be noted. For one, we must bear in mind the “pacing problem” faced by law and society in keeping up with rapid technological development. For another, the changing power dynamic and interest groups landscape in the age of AI cannot be neglected. In contrast to the conventional power dynamics in international law, States with stronger technology and more quality data will likely dominate, and one may envisage a new North-South divide reshaping the international economic order.

Keywords: Artificial Intelligence, WTO, Legal Pluralism

JEL Classification: K00, K10, K2, K33

Suggested Citation

Liu, Han-Wei and Lin, Ching-Fu, Artificial Intelligence and Global Trade Governance: A Pluralist Agenda (May 1, 2019). Harvard International Law Journal, Vol. 61, No. 2, 2020, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3675505

Han-Wei Liu (Contact Author)

Singapore Management University - Yong Pung How School of Law ( email )

55 Armenian Street
Singapore, 179943
Singapore

Monash University ( email )

900 Dandenong Road
Caulfield, Victoria 3145
Australia

HOME PAGE: http://scholar.google.com/citations?user=37GMiZcAAAAJ&hl=en

Ching-Fu Lin

National Tsing Hua University ( email )

Taiwan

HOME PAGE: http://chingfulin.net/

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Downloads
214
Abstract Views
938
Rank
258,231
PlumX Metrics