Socio-technical imaginaries of a circular economy in governmental discourse and among science, technology, and innovation actors: A Norwegian case study

Hermann, R.R., Pansera, M., Nogueira, L.A., Monteiro, M., 2022. Socio-technical imaginaries of a circular economy in governmental discourse and among science, technology, and innovation actors: A Norwegian case study. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change 183, 121903. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.202

18 Pages Posted: 2 Nov 2020 Last revised: 4 Aug 2022

See all articles by Roberto Rivas Hermann

Roberto Rivas Hermann

Nord University Business School; Centre for High North Logistics

Mario Pansera

University of Bristol; Autonomous University of Barcelona - Department of Business Administration

Leticia Antunes Nogueira

Nordland Research Institute

Marko Monteiro

UNICAMP

Date Written: August 10, 2021

Abstract

A growing body of research is investigating the connections between the discursive construction of circular economy (CE) and its influences on public policies that promote the socio-technological transition towards circular production and consumption systems. However, surprisingly little attention has focused on how CE discourses interact with science, technology, and innovation (ST&I) actors. To address this gap, this research adopts the prism of socio-technical imaginaries to understand specific visions of circularity in science and innovation, exploring how competing imaginaries mobilize specific actors, institutions, and visions of a greener future. Our empirical material included archival documentation from the Norwegian government and funded research projects on CE. Our analysis identified two key tension points within these imaginaries: “International drivers versus regional and local transition arenas” and “Ecological modernization versus sectoral transformation.” We suggest that tensions are inherent in CE socio-technical imaginaries but are often silenced or minimized by institutional discourses on circularity. Our findings suggest that official CE policy programs tend to minimize or overtly ignore criticisms and contestation that are increasingly raised in academic circles. Our findings indicate the need for increased involvement of ST&I actors and other societal actors (such as NGOs and the private sector) in the CE policymaking process to avoid endless growth as an unexpected CE policy outcome.

Keywords: circular economy, discourse analysis, environmental politics, environmental innovation, socio-technical imaginaries

JEL Classification: O21, P28, P48

Suggested Citation

Hermann, Roberto Rivas and Pansera, Mario and Pansera, Mario and Nogueira, Leticia Antunes and Monteiro, Marko, Socio-technical imaginaries of a circular economy in governmental discourse and among science, technology, and innovation actors: A Norwegian case study (August 10, 2021). Hermann, R.R., Pansera, M., Nogueira, L.A., Monteiro, M., 2022. Socio-technical imaginaries of a circular economy in governmental discourse and among science, technology, and innovation actors: A Norwegian case study. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change 183, 121903. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.202, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3690601 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3690601

Roberto Rivas Hermann (Contact Author)

Nord University Business School ( email )

Universitetsalléen 11
Bodø, 8026
Norway
+47 75 51 78 39 (Phone)

HOME PAGE: http://https://www.nord.no/no/_layouts/15/uin.internet/userprofilepage.aspx?pid=nord%5C03209700

Centre for High North Logistics ( email )

Post box 1490
Bodø, 8049
Norway

Mario Pansera

Autonomous University of Barcelona - Department of Business Administration ( email )

Campus Bellaterra, Edifici B.
Bellaterra (Barcelona), 08193
SPAIN

University of Bristol ( email )

University of Bristol,
Senate House, Tyndall Avenue
Bristol, Avon BS8 ITH
United Kingdom

Leticia Antunes Nogueira

Nordland Research Institute ( email )

Postboks 1490
Bodø, 8049
Norway

Marko Monteiro

UNICAMP ( email )

Campinas
Brazil

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Downloads
127
Abstract Views
855
Rank
405,642
PlumX Metrics