Response to the Contributors

67 Pages Posted: 14 Sep 2020 Last revised: 24 Feb 2021

See all articles by Richard S. Kay

Richard S. Kay

University of Connecticut School of Law

Date Written: August 24, 2020

Abstract

This is a pre-publication draft of an essay in which I respond briefly to 18 articles contributed to a special Festschrift issue of the Connecticut Law Review. All but one of the contributions fall within two categories – constitutional change and constitutional interpretation. These topics have engaged me for most of my career as a legal scholar. While every one of the contributions sheds new and useful light on these subjects, I usually have some differences with the interpretations argued in them Of course, I can only treat those differences superficially here. In each case, moreover, my comments should not obscure my sincere admiration of and appreciation for the authors’ efforts.

Keywords: Constitutional Law, Constituent Power, Constitutional Interpretation, Comparative Law

JEL Classification: K10, K30, K40

Suggested Citation

Kay, Richard S, Response to the Contributors (August 24, 2020). Connecticut Law Review, Vol. 52, No. 5, 2020, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3680111

Richard S Kay (Contact Author)

University of Connecticut School of Law ( email )

65 Elizabeth Street
Hartford, CT 06105
United States
860-570-5262 (Phone)

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Downloads
42
Abstract Views
566
PlumX Metrics