Contradictory Deviations from Maximization: Environment-Specific Biases, or Reflections of Basic Properties of Human Learning?

Psychological Review.

73 Pages Posted: 21 Feb 2021 Last revised: 13 Dec 2022

See all articles by Ido Erev

Ido Erev

Technion-Israel Institute of Technology - William Davidson Faculty of Industrial Engineering & Management

Eyal Ert

The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Dept. of Environmental Economics and Management

Ori Plonsky

Technion-Israel Institute of Technology

Yefim Roth

University of Haifa

Date Written: December 4, 2022

Abstract

Analyses of human reaction to economic incentives reveal contradictory deviations from maximization. For example, underinvestment in the stock market suggests risk aversion, but insufficient diversification of financial assets suggests risk-seeking. Leading explanations for these contradictions assume that different choice environments (e.g., different framings) trigger different biases. Our analysis shows that variation in the choice environment is not a necessary condition. It demonstrates how certain changes in the incentive structure are sufficient to trigger six pairs of contradictory deviations from maximization even when the choice environment is fixed. Moreover, our analysis shows that the direction of these deviations can be captured by assuming that choice propensities reflect reliance on small samples of past experiences. In order to clarify the underlying processes, we considered distinct models of the reliance on small samples assumption, and compared them to classical models of choice (including prospect theory). The comparison focused on both within-individual, and between-group predictions (based on a preregistered study with 120 new tasks). The results reveal large advantage of “wide sampling” models that (in the static settings we examine) approximate an effort to rely on the most similar past experiences. Surprisingly, we also found that assuming that the parameters reflect stable individual traits impairs predictions; it seems that that the number of “most similar past experiences” for each individual varies from task to task. These results suggest that ignoring the predictable impact of the incentive structure can lead to exaggeration of the importance of environment-specific and individual-specific decision biases.

Keywords: Underweighting of rare events; compromise effect; decoy effect; loss aversion; payoff variability effect; redrawn parameters

JEL Classification: D03, C43, C53, D83

Suggested Citation

Erev, Ido and Ert, Eyal and Plonsky, Ori and Roth, Yefim, Contradictory Deviations from Maximization: Environment-Specific Biases, or Reflections of Basic Properties of Human Learning? (December 4, 2022). Psychological Review., Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3741831 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3741831

Ido Erev

Technion-Israel Institute of Technology - William Davidson Faculty of Industrial Engineering & Management ( email )

Haifa 32000
Israel

Eyal Ert

The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Dept. of Environmental Economics and Management ( email )

P.O. Box 12
Rehovot, 76100
Israel

Ori Plonsky (Contact Author)

Technion-Israel Institute of Technology ( email )

Technion City
Haifa 32000, Haifa 32000
Israel

Yefim Roth

University of Haifa ( email )

Haifa 31905
Israel

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Downloads
198
Abstract Views
961
Rank
279,625
PlumX Metrics