Is it Time to Terminate the Traditional Terminal Value?

14 Pages Posted: 14 Dec 2020 Last revised: 28 Jan 2021

See all articles by Bradford Cornell

Bradford Cornell

Anderson Graduate School of Management, UCLA

Richard Gerger

San Marino Business Partners LLC

Date Written: November 30, 2020

Abstract

All corporate valuation models rely on very long forecasts of free cash flows. The only question is whether those forecasts are accounted for explicitly by using an extended valuation model or implicitly in an estimate of the terminal value after an explicit short-term forecast period of five to ten years. Given current computing technology, there are good reasons to use projections running out multiple decades. Doing so gives a clearer picture of the long-run issues that affect a company’s value. Of course, developing very long-term forecasts is difficult and may be considered speculative, but the difficulty and speculation are not removed by assuming that at a horizon of five or ten years the firm enters steady state and applying a constant growth terminal value model. A better approach in many circumstances may be to explicitly take account of the need for very long-term forecasts, raising the question – “Is it time to terminate the traditional terminal value?”

Keywords: valuation, terminal value, cash flow forecasts

JEL Classification: G00, G30

Suggested Citation

Cornell, Bradford and Gerger, Richard, Is it Time to Terminate the Traditional Terminal Value? (November 30, 2020). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3739020 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3739020

Bradford Cornell (Contact Author)

Anderson Graduate School of Management, UCLA ( email )

Pasadena, CA 91125
United States
626 833-9978 (Phone)

Richard Gerger

San Marino Business Partners LLC ( email )

607 Foxwood Road
La Canada Flintridge, CA 91011
United States

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Downloads
230
Abstract Views
777
Rank
243,129
PlumX Metrics