Losers’ Consent in Changing Welfare States: Output Dissatisfaction, Experienced Voice, and Political Distrust

Abstract

Mature welfare states must increasingly handle growing fiscal pressures and a multitude of needs with smaller resources. Meanwhile, evaluations of policy outputs are characterized as “the weakest link” in welfare state support, resulting in generalized political distrust. We assess the procedural fairness argument that citizens are not only concerned with welfare state outcomes but also assess the fairness of the processes of service delivery. The fairness perspective has usually been tested in cross-sectional studies, experiments, or on the “input side” of democracy. By contrast, we use primary three-wave panel data on evaluations and experiences with welfare state institutions. The REWB framework allows improved causal evidence that both outputs (service quality satisfaction) as well as procedural fairness (experienced voice opportunities) affect political trust. Crucially however, perceived fairness mitigates detrimental effects of poor outcomes. This is because procedural voice matters especially for the formation of political trust among losers.

Keywords: political trust, procedural fairness, welfare state