Blockchain Utopia and its Governance Shortfalls

24 Pages Posted: 26 Mar 2021

See all articles by Uta Kohl

Uta Kohl

University of Southampton; CUHK Law

Date Written: March 24, 2021

Abstract

This chapter sows seeds of scepticism about blockchain governance and liberation narratives. It starts off by locating these narratives within a long standing history of utopian thought on technology and law and the recurrent promises of science-driven, technological replacements of law and the State, on and off since the Enlightenment. The discussion then explores the peculiar features of blockchain technology upon which its utopian credentials are said to be grounded. First, it argues that blockchain utopias are, much like their internet predecessors, guilty of technological essentialism by drawing determinist conclusions from an underlying architectural design, and by failing to allow for the functional and technological latencies within that design. It is in their interactions with social domains that those latencies are ‘resolved’ in favour of certain configurations and not others. Such utopian narratives are not harmless when they generate blindfolds about the actual societal concretisation of the technology and its oppressive rather than emancipatory effects. Second, the discussion problematises the claimed virtue of blockchain applications as trustless systems against various conceptions of trust, and argues that blockchain does not and cannot speak to the trust questions at the interface between information and reality, for which society will continue to require trusted third parties to deliver ‘trusted’ value judgements. Furthermore, it is not a foregone conclusion that a society in which trust becomes redundant or less important would in fact be an ideal society. Third, the chapter questions the virtues that lie behind blockchain’s decentralisation theme by arguing that the corporate structure has rather successfully formalised collective action and invariably opted for centralised decision-making for coordination and functional specialisation. Moreover, the decentralisation that blockchain enables within an organisation does not touch upon economic concentration within a market, but it is the latter that presents the real 21st century challenge to the marketplace and democracy.

Keywords: blockchain, bitcoin, utopia, deterritorialisation, essentialism, techno-determinism, trust, trustless, corporate structure, collective action, intermediaries, trusted third parties, technological oppression, liberation, automated law, stateless

Suggested Citation

Kohl, Uta, Blockchain Utopia and its Governance Shortfalls (March 24, 2021). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3811416 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3811416

Uta Kohl (Contact Author)

University of Southampton ( email )

University Rd.
Southampton SO17 1BJ, Hampshire SO17 1LP
United Kingdom

CUHK Law ( email )

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Downloads
141
Abstract Views
1,085
Rank
370,717
PlumX Metrics