The Evolution of Double-Entry Bookkeeping

51 Pages Posted: 2 Jan 2018 Last revised: 4 Jun 2021

See all articles by Sudipta Basu

Sudipta Basu

Temple University - Department of Accounting

Gregory B. Waymire

Emory University - Department of Accounting

Date Written: June 2, 2021

Abstract

Double-entry bookkeeping (DEB) is used by most large firms even though scholars do not understand why they chose DEB. We address three questions about DEB’s gradual displacement of single-entry bookkeeping (SEB): (1) What is the main benefit of DEB? (2) How did DEB emerge and evolve? and (3) Why did DEB help individual firms and economies survive? We argue that the main benefit of DEB over SEB was that it enabled better measurement of the profits from individual transactions. We argue that the crucial innovation that drove DEB’s evolution was the DEBITS=CREDITS constraint that required an equity account to balance assets and liabilities, which led to continuously updated cumulative profits in a single monetary unit of account. Most importantly, we hypothesize that DEB shifted mental analysis of transactions to a more future-oriented focus that enabled competitive discovery of profit opportunities. We propose several tests of our arguments.

Keywords: Double-entry bookkeeping, economic exchange, profit measurement, discovery process, monetary unit of account

JEL Classification: M41, D23, D83, B15

Suggested Citation

Basu, Sudipta and Waymire, Gregory B., The Evolution of Double-Entry Bookkeeping (June 2, 2021). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3093303 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3093303

Sudipta Basu

Temple University - Department of Accounting ( email )

Philadelphia, PA 19122
United States
215.204.0489 (Phone)
215.204.5587 (Fax)

Gregory B. Waymire (Contact Author)

Emory University - Department of Accounting ( email )

Goizueta Business School
1300 Clifton Road
Atlanta, GA 30322
United States
404-727-6589 (Phone)
404-727-6313 (Fax)

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Downloads
504
Abstract Views
2,766
Rank
104,413
PlumX Metrics